128 SATYAPAL SINGH STATE OF CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral 1. 14.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.8540 of 2026 titled “Satyapal Singh vs. State of Haryana and ors.”. 2. submits that declared the appellant non ground that disciplinary proceedings were pe the appellant became eligible for the grant of ACP in the year 2022, no such proceedings were pending or recorded. Hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having not been pressed any further, with liberty to appellant to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge on all possible grounds available to the appellant. Further liberty may also kindly be granted to the appellant to file an appeal, in case 3. 09-07-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1807 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : SATYAPAL SINGH VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the appellant. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral In the present appeal, challenge is to the judgment dated 14.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.8540 of 2026 titled “Satyapal Singh vs. State of Haryana and ors.”. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned Single Judge, th the appellant non-suited for grant of ground that disciplinary proceedings were pe the appellant became eligible for the grant of ACP in the year 2022, no such proceedings were pending or recorded. Hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having not been pressed any further, with liberty to appellant to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge on all possible grounds available to the appellant. Further liberty may also kindly be granted to the appellant to file an appeal, in case Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH G NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1807 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.07.2026 ........ Appellant VERSUS HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the appellant. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present appeal, challenge is to the judgment dated 14.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.8540 of 2026 titled “Satyapal Singh vs. State of Haryana and ors.”. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant the learned Single Judge, through the impugned judgment, has suited for grant of first ACP scale only on the ground that disciplinary proceedings were pending against him, whereas, when the appellant became eligible for the grant of ACP in the year 2022, no such proceedings were pending or recorded. Hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having not been pressed any further, with liberty to appellant to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge on all possible grounds available to the appellant. Further liberty may also kindly be granted to the appellant to file an appeal, in case need so arises. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE / reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO In the present appeal, challenge is to the judgment dated 14.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.8540 of 2026 titled After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant the impugned judgment, has only on the , whereas, when the appellant became eligible for the grant of ACP in the year 2022, no such proceedings were pending or recorded. Hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having not been pressed any further, with liberty to the appellant to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge on all possible grounds available to the appellant. Further liberty may also kindly be ) SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.10 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document