Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28356 (AP)

Ch.Sri Rama Murthy v. The Government of A.P.

WP/18238/2013 · 2026-03-10

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.18238_2013 APHC010746942013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 18238/2013 Between: 1. CH.SRI RAMA MURTHY,, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT (UNDER TERMINATION), NREGS, SARVASUDDI GRAMAPANCHAYAT, S.RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHPATNAM. 2. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/ PROGRAMME OFFICER, NREGS, S.RAYAARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in notice No. 382/2012/DVC/B4, dated /11/2012 as illegal, arbitrary, suffers from non application of mind, contrary to G.O. Ms. No. 98, dated 09.03.2010, contrary to Circular dated 27.01.2010, contrary to orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 14121 of 2009 and batch dated 07.07.2010 and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Field Assistant under 2 HN, J W.P.No.18238_2013 N.R.E.G. Scheme of Sarvasuddi Gramapanchayat, S.Rayavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, with all consequential and incidential benefits attached to the post and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 22249 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in notice No. 382/2012/DVC/B4, dated /11/2012 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass. IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 96460 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 104887 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 3 HN, J W.P.No.18238_2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive any further for adjudication and became infructuous. 2. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.18238_2013 44 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 18238 of 2013 Date: 11.03.2026 NKA