APHC010770382013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 410/2013 Between: 1.K. MANZOOR AHMED,, S/O LATE K. ABDUL JALEEL, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: ATTENDAR, R/O KURNOOL,0/O EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.E.W.I.D.C., OPP: INDOOR STADIUM, KURNOOL. ...PETITIONER AND 1.GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SCHOOL EDUCATION (GENI.II) DEPARTMENT, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.J- BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, AP SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD, 2.ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, OPP: L.B. STADIUM, HYDERABAD. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, OPP: INDORE STADIUM, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, OPP: INDORE STADIUM, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned Proceedings of 3rd Respondent in Rc.No.1196/E2/Court Cases/2012, dated 07-12-2012 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.96 Finance (Pay Commission-II) Department, dated 20-05-2011 and set-aside the same and consequentially to direct the Respondents to pay the Special Grade Scale-2010 to the Petitioner with effect from 2002 onwards, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 510 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings of the 3rd Respondent in his Rc.No.11961E21Court Cases/2012, dated 07-12-2012, and pay the Special Grade Scale, 2010 to the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass ; 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.C H SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.A SANJEEV KUMAR(SC FOR APEWIDCL CIVIL) 2.GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION 3.G V S KISHORE KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 410/2013 ORDER: There was no representation for the petitioner on 05.02.2026 and also on 17.02.2026, and accordingly, the matter was posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Today, when the matter was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 20.02.2026 KGM 4 129 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.410 of 2013 Dated 20.02.2026 KGM