STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. v. MRINAL KANTI CHATTOPADHYAY
WP.ST/59/2026 · 2026-07-15
Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28349 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28349 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
15th July, 2026 (D/L No.19) Ct. No.4 (SKB)
W.P.S.T. 59 of 2026
State of West Bengal and another Versus Mrinal Kanti Chattopadhyay
1. There is none to represent the writ petitioners. No accommodation is sought for.
2. It appears that on earlier occasions i.e. on 23.03.2026 and 08.05.2026 there was also none to represent the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest to proceed with the matter.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. Connected application/s, if any, stands dismissed.
4. Interim order/s, if any, stands vacated.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)