SABITA SAHA SINGHA ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/16228/2026 · 2026-07-17
Suvra Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28339 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28339 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
July 17, 2026 (39) ARDR WPA 16228 of 2026
Sabita Saha Singha Roy Vs. The State of West Bengal & ors.
Adv. Ipsita Ghosh, …for the petitioner. Adv. Soumya Kanti Sinha, Adv. Suparna Das, Adv. Sanjana Basu, …for the State.
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. The petitioner alleges that the private respondent is raising unauthorised construction without obtaining sanction from the concerned Panchayat. The petitioner submitted a representation in this regard before the concerned authority on 23rd June, 2026 and seeks
consideration of the same. In view of the allegation made by the petitioner against the private respondent, the Pradhan, Somospur I Gram Panchayat, being the 3rd respondent herein, is
directed to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 23rd June, 2026 within four weeks from the date of communication of this order upon granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to all concerned including the petitioner and the private respondent, in accordance with law. The decision taken by the authority shall be communicated to the parties within a week thereof. In the event the construction raised by the private respondent is found to be illegal/unauthorised, the
2 concerned authority shall take necessary steps in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)