Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28337 (AP)

K VENKATESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/981/2026 · 2026-03-17

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010724282025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 981/2026 Between: 1. K VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. MUTYALU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. CIVIL CONTRACTOR, R/O. SOUTHERN STREET, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534001. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (MAUD) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237. 2. THE ELURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534001. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534001. 4. THE DIRECTOR, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521456 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M K RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri G. Sai Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.K. Raj Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development and Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Eluru Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri G. Sai Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.K. Raj Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Writ Petitioner has received the payment and no further consideration is necessary. 3. Having recorded the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:18.03.2026 Vns