Nalati Sivakumar Latha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/37542/2018 · 2026-02-10
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28334 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28334 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010777702018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37542/2018 Between:
1. NALATI SIVAKUMAR LATHA,, W/O. DHARMA LINGAM SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.
NO. 2-348, KONDAMETTA, SRIKALAHASTHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. P. PULLAIAH, S/O. VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KONDAMETTA, SRIKALAHASTHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. REP. BY HIS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI T.
SRIRAM PRASAD NAIDU, S/O. PURUSHOTHAM NAIDU,
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, VENKATAGIRI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the
2 JS,J W.P.No.37542/2018
property admeasuring Ac. 1-00 Cents in Sy. No. 109/9b and an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy. No. 109/9d situated at Pariayavaram (Chevireddy Palli) Revenue Village, Venkatagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District without any notice and following of due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession of the property admeasuring Ac. 1-00 Cents in Sy. No. 109/9b and an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy. No. 109/9d situated at Pariayavaram (Chevireddy Palli) Revenue Village, Venkatagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring Ac. 1-00 Cents in Sy. No. 109/9b and an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy. No. 109/9d situated at Pariayavaram (Chevireddy Palli) Revenue Village, Venkatagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3 JS,J W.P.No.37542/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief:
“…..to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring Ac. 1-00 Cents in Sy. No. 109/9b and an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy. No. 109/9d situated at Pariayavaram (Chevireddy Palli) Revenue Village, Venkatagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District without any notice and following of due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession of the property admeasuring Ac. 1-00 Cents in Sy. No. 109/9b and an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy. No. 109/9d situated at Pariayavaram (Chevireddy Palli) Revenue Village, Venkatagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and pass…”
Heard both the learned counsel. 2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel on both sides consented to dispose the writ petition by making interim order dated 12.10.2018 as absolute. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of by making the interim order passed by this Court on 12.10.2018 as absolute. However, liberty is granted to the respondents to take appropriate action against the petitioners, if so advised, in accordance with law, subject to the petitioners’ possession in the subject land. No order as to costs. 4 JS,J W.P.No.37542/2018
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 11.02.2026
RSD
5 JS,J W.P.No.37542/2018
26 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 37542/2018
Dated: 11.02.2026
RSD