BABLU KUMAR RAM @ BHATIYA @ BHATIA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4194/2026 · 2026-10-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28329 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28329 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:30242] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4194 of 2026
------ Bablu Kumar Ram @ Bhatiya @ Bhatia, aged about 35 years, S/o Late Raju Ram, R/o Sector 4, Jhopari, P.O. & P.S. – Sector 4, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-05 Dated:-08-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sector 12 P.S. Case No. 148 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4), 305(a) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft from the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of self-confessional statement as well as the confessional statement of the co-accused Prasanjeet Kumar @ Sipahi & Rohit Mehra. It is also submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.03.2026 as mentioned in para- 12 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro in connection with Sector 12 P.S. Case No. 148 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-08.10.2026 Saroj/