APHC010852202018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41147/2018 Between: 1. VUNNAM VENKATA REDDY, S/O VUNNAM CHENNAIAH AGED. 68 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST AND PENSIONER R/O 91/4-97-5, KARTHIKEYA NAGAR NEAR KESHAV REDDY SCHOOL, KURNOOL-518006. 2. VUNNAM PULLAMMA, W/O CHENNAIAH, AGED. 96 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O 91/4-97-5,KARTHIKEYA NAGAR NEAR KESHAV REDDY SCHOOL, KURNOOL-518006. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPT. SECRETARIAT BLDGS, AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISION OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KURNOOL MANDAL AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declaring the action of the respondents 3 in issuing Endorsement dt. 5-09-2018 without demarcating the land of the Petitioners by rectifying the mistakes in 2 revenue records pertaining to the land in Sy.No. 135 and 136 situated within the revenue limits of Mamdalapadu Village, Kurnool Mandal and District as illegal, arbitrary against the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to rectify the mistake in revenue records in respect of land in Sy.No. 135 and 136 or to pass such other orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioners dt. 9-4-16 pending disposal of Writ Petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 15-11-2018 in WP. 41147/2018. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KIRAN PALAKURTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following 3 ORDER: When the matter was posted on 17.02.2026 and 24.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The matter was again listed on 06.03.2026; on that day too, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and consequently, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’. 2. When the matter was called today under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:16.03.2026 DSH