Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28328 (AP)

D. KRISHNAIAH, CHITTOOR DIST. v. PRL. SECY., P.R. & R.D. DEPT. & 3 ORS.

WP/39609/2014 · 2026-03-02

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.39609_2014 APHC010735232014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 39609/2014 Between: 1. D. KRISHNAIAH, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O. D.BUDDAIAH AGED 40 YEARS, OCC: APO SRI KALAHASTHI RIO CHAMURU VILLAGE THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY P R R D DEPT 3 ORS, PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD 2. THE MEMBER SECRETARY, SOCIETY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES O/O COMMISSIONER RURAL DEVELOPMENT 5-10-192 HUDA HERMITAGE OFFICE COMPLEX HILL FORT ROAD SAIFABAD HYDERABAD 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for records relating to the impugned orders vide ROC No: HR/D1/4498/2014 dt 31-10-2014 of Petitioner of the 4th respondent placing the petitioner under suspension and quash the same by holding as illegal arbitrary highhanded and cannot be justified in the eye of law and 2 HN, J W.P.No.39609_2014 consequently direct the respondents to reinstate and continue the petitioner with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 49672 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate and continue the petitioners 1 and 2 by suspend the impugned proceedings vide ROC No: HR/D1/4498/2014 dt 31- 10-2014 and also petitioner No: 2 was placed under suspension vide ROC No: HR/D1/966/2014 dt 31-10-2014 of the 4th respondent forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP 3536 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt.30-12-2014 in W.P.No.39609 of 2014 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) 3 HN, J W.P.No.39609_2014 ORDER: 1. The grievance of the petitioner has been duly adequately addressed by the respondents. It is submitted that the interim orders passed by this Court on 30.12.2014 have been complied with. 2. In compliance with the said interim directions, the petitioner was reinstated into service on 05.08.2015. The fact of such reinstatement and compliance has been specifically stated in the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.4. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, and considering that the relief sought by the petitioner has already been granted and nothing further survives for adjudication, the writ petition no longer requires for consideration. Accordingly, the present writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:03.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.39609_2014 11 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 39609 of 2014 Date: 03.03.2026 NKA