Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28327 (CAL)

JAGAI HALDAR AND ORS v. PRASANTA KUMAR BAIDYA

CO/2256/2026 · 2026-07-15

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 15.07.2026 (AD 32) (S. Banerjee) CO 2256 of 2026 Jagai Haldar & Ors. Vs. Prasanta Kumar Baidya Mr. Mujibar Ali Naskar Ms. Ritika Yadav …for the petitioners Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that by suppressing an order passed by the Executive Magistrate under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the opposite-party filed the instant suit and obtained an order of injunction. He submits that the order of injunction should be vacated for such reason. The order of injunction is appellable under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure. After some argument learned advocate appearing for the petitioners prays for leave to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the learned trial judge with an appropriate application. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners this application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take appropriate steps before the learned trial judge in accordance with law. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)