N. Satyanarayana v. Greater Visakha Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its
WP/33887/2013 · 2026-03-09
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28327 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28327 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010765482013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 33887/2013 Between:
1. N. SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. LATE N. VENKANNA, HINDU, AGED 67 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.201
2. P.B.K. SATISH,, S/O. P. BRAHMAJI, HINDU, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O.
FLAT NO.202
3. ARYASOMAYAJULA JAYA,, W/O. A. MOHAN RAO, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS, RIO. FLAT NO.301
4. K. RAMESH,, S/O. LATE K.S. SASTRY, HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.402
5. M. SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. M. SAMBASIVA RAO, HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.502 PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF DHANUNJAYA HEIGHTS, HIG- 10, MADHAVADHARA, VUDA COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. GREATER VISAKHA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP BY ITS, COMMISSIONER, NEAR RTC COMPLEX, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. D S N RAJU, FLAT NO. 101 & 102, DHANUNJAYA HEIGHTS, HIG-10, MADHAVADHARA, VUDA COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM
3. D R R G KRISHNAM RAJU, FLAT NO. 401 &501, DHANUNJAYA HEIGHTS, HIG-10, MADHAVADHARA, VUDA COLONY,
2
VISAKHAPATNAM RR 2&3 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT. 4-12- 13 IN WPMP 43457 OF 13
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S V S RAVI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC)
2. G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
None appeared for the Writ Petitioners.
2. On 03.03.2026, when this Writ Petition was listed, there was no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. Hence, it was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
3. Today also no one has represented the Writ Petitioners.
4. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:10.03.2026 Vns