2026:JHHC:29749 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8994 of 2026 Md. Mosadik Ansari @ Mosadik Ansari @ Mosdik Ansari aged about 45 Years S/O Late Jamanat Ansari, Resident of Village: Rahmat Nagar Sisai, Post Office & Police Station: Sisai, District: Gumla (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Advocate For the Informant : Md. Zafar Alam, Advocate --- 06/5th October 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Sisai P.S. Case No. 70/2026 for the offence registered under Section 64(2) (m), 115(2), 303(2), 351(2) of BNS and Sections 66E, 67A of IT Act and Section 3/4 of Jharkhand Freedom of Religion Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gumla. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.06.2026, charge-sheet has been submitted on 06.08.2026 and charge has already been framed for alleged offence under Sections 64(2) (m), 115(2), 303(2), 351(2) of BNS. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that two cases under the NDPS Act were also registered against the informant being Sisai P.S. Case No. 113 of 2020 and Sisai P.S. Case No. 82 of 2021. 4. The informant had also filed a criminal case being Sisai P.S. Case No. 42 of 2019 against Rahmul Ansari and Jahid Ansari for the alleged offences under Sections 376, 511, 448 and 341 of the IPC. The said case was compromised between the parties and the accused persons were acquitted in the said case. 5. The learned counsel submits that although the petitioner has criminal antecedents but the petitioner has been granted bail in all the cases and most 2026:JHHC:29749 2 of the cases are relating to Jharkhand Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter) Act, 2005 and none of the case is a crime against women. 6. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that he has no objection if the petitioner is enlarged on bail and affidavit to that effect has also been filed. 7. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. 8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the informant of the case has no objection if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gumla in connection with Sisai P.S. Case No. 70/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 9. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 10. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 05.10.2026 Uploaded On: 06.10.2026 Mukul/-