[2026:RJ-JP:16936] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3909/2026 Aasam S/o Gujji, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Rundhkhoh, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 22/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.235/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for offences under Sections 303(2), 308(2), 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act, 2000. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. She further submits that co-accused Mausam and Sattar have been granted the benefit of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide orders dated 26.03.2025 and 03.03.2025 respectively and co- accused Aakiv, Aslam, and Misla were granted anticipatory bail by [2026:RJ-JP:16936] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3909/2026] Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.02.2025. She again submits that co-accused Mohammad Yusuf and Mustafa have been granted benefit of regular bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.01.2025. The case of the petitioner is akin to them. Petitioner is behind the bars since 12.02.2026 though 15 cases have been reported against the present petitioner but in three cases he is acquitted and rest of the cases pertains from year 2003 to 2019. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Aasam S/o Gujji, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- [2026:RJ-JP:16936] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3909/2026] (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/17