[123+295 Rajender and others State of Haryana and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN CM-10151 [1] Section 151 CPC for 110 as co- [2] allowed, subject to all just exceptions. [3] CWP-19095 [1] is that the demolition is being carried out by the respondents w issuance of any notice d established possession since long +295] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-10151 CWP-19095 Date of Decision : Rajender and others versus of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Karanyog Singh Riar, Advocate Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G. Haryana **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) 10151-CWP-2026 This is an application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for impleading the proposed applicant/petitioner Nos.7 to -petitioners. For the reasons as are mentioned in the application, the , subject to all just exceptions. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. 19095-2026 (O&M) The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that the demolition is being carried out by the respondents w issuance of any notice despite the fact that the petitioners are in established possession since long. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 10151-CWP-2026 in/and 19095-2026 Date of Decision : 07.07.2026 …Petitioners ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate with Ms. Mamta, Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G. Haryana. filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with proposed applicant/petitioner Nos.7 to For the reasons as are mentioned in the application, the same is Amended memo of parties is taken on record. The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that the demolition is being carried out by the respondents without espite the fact that the petitioners are in filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with proposed applicant/petitioner Nos.7 to same is The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition ithout espite the fact that the petitioners are in RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.10 12:31 I agree to specified portions of this document CM-10151-CWP-2026 in/and -2- CWP-19095-2026 [2] While issuing notice of motion on 22.06.2026, this Court passed the following order:- “ On 10.06.2026, the following order was passed: Instant petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate directions to the respondent-'authorities for keeping the ongoing demolition and dispossession of the residents of Nehru Colony, NIT Faridabad in abeyance. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that rights of the petitioners stand crystallized under the Haryana Evacuee Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 2008 and Rules of 2011 (Annexures P-3 & P-4). It is contended that the demolition process is in the teeth of the directions passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Re: Directions in The Matter of Demolition of Structures, (2025) 5 SCC 1. Notice of motion. Notice re: stay also. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana accepts notices on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 & 4 to 6 and prays for short accommodation to file relevant documents in support of the stand of the respondents-State. Let the needful be done well before the next date of hearing with copy in advance to the counsel opposite. Adjourned to 16.06.2026. Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 submits that the reply in terms of order passed by this Court on 10.06.2026 has been file in the Registry of this Court, a copy whereof has already been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. However, the reply is not available with the case file. Short reply of Vijay Singh, Naib Tehsildar (Sales), Faridabad on behalf of respondents No.1, 2, 5 and 6 filed RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.10 12:31 I agree to specified portions of this document CM-10151-CWP-2026 in/and -3- CWP-19095-2026 today in Court, is taken on record. Registry to do the needful. Adjourned to 07.07.2026. Status quo qua the petitioners only shall be maintained till the next date of hearing.” [3] Today, Mr. Kaushik, appearing for the respondents, on instructions from Mr. Satish, LA, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, submits that he has instructions to submit that even though the demolitions were carried out after issuance of notice, however, in order to allay the fear of the petitioners, fresh notices will be issued and thereafter further action will be taken in accordance with law. [4] Taking into consideration the fair stand taken by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is disposed off in terms of his statement. [5] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 07.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.10 12:31 I agree to specified portions of this document