2026:JHHC:30161 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9076 of 2026 Asraf Ansari, aged about 26 years, son of Majid Miya, resident of Village Dumariya Kuruwa, P.O. and P.S. Sonaraithari, District Deoghar, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.PP --- 04/08.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 18.06.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.91 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023, along with Sections 66(B),66(C),66(D) and 84(C) of the Information Technology (I.T.) Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and 1 mobile phone and 1 SIM card standing in the name of the petitioner are alleged to have been recovered from the petitioner. It is further submitted that during investigation, only 1 victim has been identified to the extent of Rs.11,000/- and charge sheet has already been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the 2026:JHHC:30161 2 petitioner is ready to deposit Rs.11,000/- without prejudice to his contentions at the stage of trial. 5. Learned counsel for the State, while opposing the prayer for bail, has referred to paragraph 40 of the case diary to submit that numerous attempts were made by the petitioner for committing cyber offence and 2 crime links have been found and 1 victim identified, while further investigation is still going on. It is further submitted that from the confessional statement of the petitioner, it has come that transaction vouchers were given to one Fayaz Ansari and there was a sharing of 50% in the proceeds of crime. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the facts that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and chargesheet has been submitted , the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.91 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall deposit cash amount of Rs.11,000/- before the learned court, which is the alleged defrauded amount linked with the identified victim. The deposit will be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in the trial. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. 2026:JHHC:30161 3 (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:08.10.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:08.10.2026