Sri Y.Nagaiah, C.950333 Contract Driver v. The APSRTC., rep.by its Managing Director
WP/3182/2014 · 2026-02-24
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28302 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28302 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010741262014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3182/2014 Between:
1.SRI Y.NAGAIAH, C.950333 CONTRACT DRIVER,, S/O Y.KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO.24/1571, BRAHMANANDAPURAM, ARGAMITTA, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE APSRTC REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BUS BHAVAN, RTC X ROADS, HYDERABAD. 2.THE REGIONAL MANAGER APSRTC NELLORE RGION, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3.THE DEPUTY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER APSRTC, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 4.THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC SULLURUPET DEPOT, SULLURUPET, NELLORE DISTRICT. 5.THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC NELLOREI DEPOT, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent modifying the punishment from termination to reinstatement as afresh employee vide proceedings No.PA/675(50)/13-RM(NLR), dt.03-07-2013 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Regulation-8 of APSRTC CCA Regulations, consequently direct the respondents to grant the continuity of service from the date of termination to till the date of reinstatement i.e., from 15-09-2012 to till 03-07-2013 to the petitioner herein, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 3917 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to reckon the service of the petitioner from the date of termination to till the date of reinstatement i.e., from 15-09-2012 to till 03-072013 as per law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court reported in 2007(5) ALD page 416, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.S A K MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC The Court made the following:
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.3182 of 2014 ORDER:
1. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent- Corporation that the petitioner is no longer in the service of the respondent-Corporation and that efforts to trace his Service Record have also yielded no results. It is further submitted that, though there is an order was issued by the respondent to report for duty, he never complied with the same. 2.
Recording the submissions of the learned Standing Counsel, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition, as the writ petitioner has not reported for duty for the past several years. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 25.02.2026 KGM
3 162 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.3182 of 2014 Dated 25.02.2026 KGM