Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 283 (ALL)

BANKEY LAL AND 10 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 19 OTHERS

WRIC/7777/2026 · 2026-03-17

Prakash Padia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 7777 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private-respondents. 3. The only prayer made by the petitioner in the present writ petition is to direct the Respondent No.3 namely C.D.O./A.D.M.C. (Finance & Revenue), Jaunpur to decide a merit u/s 30(2) of U.P. Revenue Code Case No.202314360006023 pending since 29.11.2023 in accordance with law, within stipulated period. 4. Heard counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Respondent No.3 namely C.D.O./A.D.M.C. (Finance & Revenue), Jaunpur, to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournment, unless there is no legal impediment. March 18, 2026 Swati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lal Chandra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Bankey Lal And 10 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 19 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad