Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28294 (AP)

Y.Chandrasekhar v. The State of A. P.

WP/37556/2018 · 2026-02-19

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010767272018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NOs: 37556, 37365 AND 37564 2018 WRIT PETITION NO: 37556/2018 Between: 1. Y.CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O. BATHI NAIDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. SRIKRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE(ASSIGNMENT) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS CUM CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, A. P. VELAGAPUDI AT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 4. THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, direction/direction(s), order or orders more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Order Dt. 18.11.2017 passed by the 3rd respondent in Proceedings No. D. Dis. No. (E4) 685/2006 in so far as Petitioner is concerned as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of Natural Justice, apart from contrary to the provisions under A.P. Assigned lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 R/W A.P.Board Standing orders by setting aside the same in the interest of justice and consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the land an extent of Ac.1.60 cents in Sy. No 277/4. And an extent of Ac.1.86 cents in Sy. No. 3/2, of Sri krishinapuram village accounts H/o. Bonupalli Village, Tottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in D.Dis.(E4)/685/2006, dt. 18.11.2017 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) WRIT PETITION NO: 37365/2018 Between: 1. P.HARISH, S/O.P.SUDHAKAR NAIDU, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O.YERRAMITTA VILLAGE, H/O. BONUPALLI VILLAGE, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 3 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE(ASSIGNMENT) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS CUM, CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, A. P. VELAGAPUDI AT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 4. THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, direction/direction(s), order or orders more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Order Dt. 18.11.2017 passed by the 3rd respondent in Proceedings No. D. Dis. No. (E4) 685/2006 in so far as Petitioner is concerned as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of Natural Justice apart from contrary to the provisions under A.P. Assigned lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 R/W A.P.Board Standing orders by setting aside the same in the interest of justice and consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the land an extent of Ac.1.70 cents in Sy. No. 277/6 of Srikrishnapuram village accounts H/o. Bonupalli Village, Tottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order passed by the and respondent in D.Dis.(E4)/685/2006, dt. 18.11.2017 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 4 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) WRIT PETITION NO: 37564/2018 Between: 1. Y.SUBBAMMA, W/O LATE BATHI NAIDU, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O. BONUPALLE VILLAGE, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE(ASSIGNMENT) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS CUM CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, A. P. VELAGAPUDI AT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 4. THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, direction/ direction(s), order or orders more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Order Dt. 18.11.2017 passed by the 3rd respondent in Proceedings No. D. Dis. No. (E4) 685/2006 in so far as Petitioner is concerned as illegal, arbitrary 5 and violation of principles of Natural Justice, apart from contrary to the provisions under A.P. Assigned lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 R/W A.P.Board Standing orders by setting aside the same in the interest of justice and consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the land an extent of Ac. 1.86 cents in Sy.No. 3/4 and an extent of Ac. 1.86 cents in Sy. No. 3/1 of Srikrishinapuram village accounts H/o. Bonupalli Village, Tottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in D.Dis.(E4)/685/2006, dt. 18.11.2017 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Otherwise, I will be put much hardship and irreparable loss. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 6 The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment/Revenue. Since the issue in all three writ petitions is identical, they are being decided together via this single order. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue consented to the disposal of the writ petition. Without going into merits of the case, the Court directs the 2nd respondent to dispose of CCLA’s Lr.No.BCW2/283/2018, dated 17.02.2026, within four (4) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 20.02.2026 KAS 7 131 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NOs: 37556, 37365 AND 37564 2018 Dated: 20.02.2026 KAS