Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28286 (JHR)

SHRABAN KUMAR @ SHRAVAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8721/2026 · 2026-10-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:29913] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8721 of 2026 ------ Shraban Kumar @ Shravan Kumar, aged about 31 years, son of Ramji Yadav, Resident of Village Panchmahala, Post Office Mahumada, Police Station Islampur, District Nalanda, State Bihar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-06-10-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.214 of 2022 (S) registered for the offences punishable under Section 406, 420, 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons, loaded the truck and administered intoxicating substance to the driver of the said truck and took away the same and fired upon the police personnel who were trying to intercept the truck. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph-03 of the Supplementary Affidavit dated 29.09.2026, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.06.2026 as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.214 of 2022 (S) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-06.10.2026-Animesh/