APHC010756342014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 38617/2014 Between: 1. MALISETTY APPA RAO, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 48 YEARS GUNTUR, BUSINESS R/O GUNTUR CITY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P MUN ADMN HYD 2 OTRS, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR GUNTUR DISTRICT, - 3. GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUBBA RAO POSANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 3. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Krishna Vamsi, learned Counsel representing Sri Subba Rao Posani, learned Counsel for the Petitioners; Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for MAUD; and Sri S. Vijaya Kumar, learned Counsel representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri S. Vijaya Kumar, learned Counsel representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, dated 26.01.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. Para 2 of the Written Instructions is usefully extracted hereunder: “It is submitted that the petitioner has vacated the premises without intimation to this respondent Corporation without paying rents to this respondent Corporation and at present the Brodipet shopping complex is almost is vacant due to the complex is in dilapidated condition. Hence the petition infructious.” 4. The above extract would indicate that the petitioner vacated the premises without intimating the respondent Corporation and without paying rents to the Corporation, and that at present the Brodipet Shopping Complex is almost vacant, as the complex is in a dilapidated condition. 5. Having so recorded, this Court is of the view that no cause survives in this Writ Petition. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 28.01.2026 DSV 234 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 38617/2014 28.01.2026 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 38617/2014 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 28.01.2026 GRKP, J Writ Petition is dismissed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV