Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28285 (CAL)

RINKU PATRA MONDAL v. SAMARESH MONDAL

CO/2209/2026 · 2026-07-14

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item- 16. sg 14-07-2026 Ct. 6 CO 2209 of 2026 Rinku Parta Mondal Versus Samaresh Mondal [ Mr. Gopal Chandra Ghosh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajkrishna Mondal …for the petitioner After some argument, Mr. Ghosh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a direction be passed upon the learned Additional District Judge, 6th Court, Paschim Medinipur, to dispose of the application for interim custody expeditiously. He submits that the said application is otherwise ready for hearing as the written objection thereto has already been filed. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to serve notice upon the opposite party. However the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order to the opposite party forthwith. In the light of the submission made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner, this civil revisional application stands disposed of by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, 6th Court, Paschim Medinipur, to make all endeavour to take up the hearing of the application for interim custody on the next date fixed, if the same is otherwise ready for hearing and to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the next date fixed without, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.) 2