Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28277 (PNJ)

PUNJAB HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION v. BHUPESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

LPA/918/2026 · 2026-07-09

Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-4167-LPA-2026 in/and XOBJL-1-2026 and LPA-918-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (125) CM-4167-LPA-2026 in/and XOBJL-1-2026 and LPA-918-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.07.2026 Punjab Health System Corporation ...Appellant Versus Bhupesh Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Deepanshu Mehta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Bikramjit Singh Patwalia, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Masih, Advocate for the respondents in LPA-918-2026 and for cross-objectors in XOBJL-1-2026. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant submits that all the arguments needed to be brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge could not be brought to his notice, hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge with the permission that in case the appellants are not successful in review, they can file an appropriate appeal. 2. Ordered accordingly. KANCHAN 2026.07.10 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CM-4167-LPA-2026 in/and XOBJL-1-2026 and LPA-918-2026 (O&M) 2 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. CM-4167-LPA-2026 in XOBJL-1-2026 Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 25 days in filing the cross objections. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 98 days in filing the cross objections is condoned. XOBJL-1-2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents who have also filed cross objections, submits that as the appeal has been withdrawn, the cross objections may also be disposed of having been not pressed at this stage with liberty to raise the same claim as and when any appeal is preferred by the appellants. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) July 09, 2026 JUDGE kanchan Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KANCHAN 2026.07.10 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment