CRM-M-36113-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CRM-M-36113-2026 Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 ANURAG @ ANURAG NIMESH ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL. Present: Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C) with a prayer for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 266 dated 29.11.2025 under Sections 190,191(3), 115(2), 117(1), 126(2), 110, 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 (Sections 149,148,323,322,341,308,506 IPC) registered at Police Station Sector- 17, Faridabad District Faridabad. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 29.11.2025, the complainant along with one Rahul Singh had gone to a Gym in Sector 16 Faridabad and while returning, Rahul Singh was allegedly attacked by the petitioner alongwith 8-10 other unidentified persons. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the no specific injury has been attributed to the petitioner. He further argued that mandatory provisions of Section 35 of BNSS has not been complied with. He further submits that the co-accused have already been granted concession of regular bail by this Court vide order dated 06.05.2026 in CRM-M-24304-2026. The petitioner is willing and RENU RAWAT 2026.07.10 17.05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-36113-2026 2 ready to join the investigation. 4. Notice of motion. 5. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, learned AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and vehemently opposes the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is also seen in the CCTV footage inflicting injuries upon the injured with a danda. He further submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is necessary for effecting the recovery of the said danda. 6. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record. 7. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the danda allegedly used in the commission of the offence is yet to be recovered, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required for a thorough investigation, this Court is of the view that no exceptional or extra ordinary circumstances are made out to extend the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, the present petition is hereby dismissed. (H.S.GREWAL) 07.07.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.10 17.05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh