Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28272 (JHR)

SOMBARI BASKEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8311/2026 · 2026-10-06

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:29883 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8311 of 2026 1. Sombari Baskey aged about 65 years, wife of Alhan Baskey 2. Alhan Baskey, aged about 67 years, son of late Mangal Baskey Both are resident of H. No. 32, Mathladih, P.O. and P.S. Bagbera, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rishav Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, APP 06/06.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are in custody in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No. 82 of 2023, for the offences registered under Sections 341,323,504,498-A and 34 of the IPC (vide order dated 13.12.2023, Section 306 IPC was added), pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased and the deceased had committed suicide and charge sheet has been submitted for the alleged offence under Sections 323/341/306/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel has submitted that deceased had suffered burn injury herself and the statement of the deceased prior to her death has also been recorded in the case diary. The deceased is the informant of the case. The learned counsel submits that as per the allegation, there was love marriage between the deceased and her husband and the petitioners used to misbehave with the deceased and there was repeated quarrel at home. The learned counsel submits that there is no direct allegation against the petitioners. The marriage was solemnized in the year 2009 and there is no allegation of any demand of dowry. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that because of the quarrel the deceased committed suicide. ( 2026:JHHC:29883 ) 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioners are mother-in-law and father- in-law of the deceased and charge sheet has already been submitted; there is allegation of quarrel in the family, the petitioners above named are directed to be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No. 82 of 2023, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (ii) The other bailor should be their close relative. (iii) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (iv) The petitioners will deposit a self-attested copy of their Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 06.10.2026 Uploaded on 09.10.2026 Binit/