Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2827 (RAJ)

ALFEJ KHAN S/O ABDUL NAFEES v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3673/2026 · 2026-04-22

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16939] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3673/2026 Alfej Khan S/o Abdul Nafees, Age 22 Years, R/o Ward Number 17, Dhakad Mandir Ke Pass Morak Station, Police Station Morak, District Kota Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota). ----Accused Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 22/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No 13/2026 registered at Police Station Morak, District Kota Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1), 121(1), 121(2), 132, 111(2)(b), 189(2) of BNS and under Sections 3, 5, 25, 25(6), 4 of Arms Act, in which charge-sheet has been filed under Sections 109(1), 321(1), 121(2), 132, 111(2)(b), 263(b), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since January, 2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; that no allegation of firing is attributed to the [2026:RJ-JP:16939] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3673/2026] accused-petitioner; that the main accused persons are Aadil Mirja, Faisal @ Tipu and Fyum Khan; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since January, 2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused- petitioner; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Alfej Khan S/o Abdul Nafees is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:16939] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3673/2026] 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /16