SARFARAZ AHMAD v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.COMMR/SECTY TO (REVENUE) AND ORS
WP(C)/2976/2025 · 2026-09-07
Rajnesh Oswal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2827 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2827 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 15
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CM(5889/2026) IN WP(C) 2976/2025 SARFARAZ AHMAD …PETITIONER(S) Through: Mr. Hakim Suhail Ishtiaq, Advocate V/s.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.COMMR/SECTY TO (REVENUE) AND ORS ...RESPONDENT(S) Through: Mr. Salim Gupkari, Advocate (for applicant)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 07.09.2026
01. This is an application for dismissal of the writ petition as having been rendered infructuous on account of withdrawal of the
order impugned in the writ petition by the Divisional Commissioner in terms of order dated 26.11.2025.
02. Notice.
03. Notice waived by Mr. Hakim Suhail Ishtiaq, learned Advocate, on behalf of the non-applicant/petitioner.
04. A perusal of the record reveals that the order dated 22.11.2025, issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, was impugned by the non-applicant/petitioner. However, in terms of order dated 26.11.2025, the said order has been withdrawn.
05. In view of the above, the writ petition preferred by the petitioner has been rendered infructuous. Mr. Hakim Suhail Ishtiaq,
learned counsel for the non-applicant/petitioner has also conceded that, in view of the subsequent order dated 26.11.2025, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition.
06. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
07. A copy of this order be placed on the record of WP(C) No. 2976/2025.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 07.09.2026 Junaid