1 APHC010290542026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15295/2026 Between: 1. NANDIKATTU VEERA VENKATA SURYA SYAM PRASAD,, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. PVT EMPLOYEE, R/O 8-181, SIVAJI VEEDHI, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 521230. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522238. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522502. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522004. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TENALI III TOWN POLICE STATION, BALAJIRAO PET, CHENCHUPET, TENALI, ANDHRA PRADESH-522201. 5. PATHAKOTA PAVITHRA, W/O SANJAY GANDHI, D/O HARI BABU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RIO MOPARRU, AMRUTHALURU MANDALAM, BAPATLA DISTRICT PREVIOUSLY GUNTUR 2 DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522312. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.4 in summoning the petitioner to their police station without any registration of crime as illegal, arbitrary and amounts to abdication of statutory duties cast up on them and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the Petitioner unless authorized by the law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to summon the petitioner to their police station unless authorized by law pending disposal of Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENSO LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15295/2026 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking an order directing the 4th respondent not to illegally summon or interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner contending that at the instance of the 5th respondent, wife of the brother of the petitioner, the petitioner has been summoned. 2. Answering the same, the learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit on the basis of written instructions that written representation is given by the 5th respondent about missing of her husband and in connection with such man-missing case, the petitioner has been summoned and there is no illegal interference. 3. Upon considering the factual matrix and also recording the undertaking of the petitioner that he will cooperate in connection with the investigation of missing complaint, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent- police not to unnecessarily summon the petitioner and to strictly follow BNSS. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Date: 11.06.2026 ARR 4 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15295/2026 Date: 11.06.2026 ARR