Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28267 (CAL)

LAUREL INVESTMENT LIMITED v. RAJ KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.

AP/34/2026 · 2026-07-14

Gaurang Kanth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OD-3 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE AP/34/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026 LAUREL INVESTMENT LIMITED VS RAJ KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH Date : 14th July, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Rachit Lakhmani, Adv. Mr. Shubham Gupta, Adv. Mr. Piyush Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajsekhar Bal Bakshi, Adv. …for the petitioner Mr. Saurabh Guhathakurata, Adv. Mr. Abhratanu Sarkar, Adv. …for the respondents The Court: The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking substitution of the Arbitrator. Since the mandate of the learned arbitrator is extended in AP 209/2025, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (GAURANG KANTH, J.) R.Bhar