Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28261 (CAL)

DAMAYANTI GANGULI @ SANYAL v. UDAY GANGULI AND ANR

CO/2264/2026 · 2026-07-16

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item- 17. sg 16-07-2026 Ct. 6 CO 2264 of 2026 Damayanti Ganguly @ Sanyal Versus Uday Ganguli & Anr. [ Mr. Praswanta Bishal …for the petitioner On the prayer of the learned advocate for the petitioner, leave is granted to the learned advocate-on-rcord of the petitioner to amend the cause title of the civil revisional application, here and now. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the wife praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, 10th Court, Alipore, to dispose of the Matrimonial Suit no. 46 of 2017, expeditiously. From the order sheets appended to this application, this Court find that 4th August, 2026 has been fixed for cross- examination of DW-1. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to serve notice upon the opposite parties. However the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order to the opposite parties forthwith. In the light of the submission made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner, this civil revisional application stands disposed of by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, 10th Court, Alipore, to take up the suit for further cross-examination of DW-1 on the next date fixed i.e. on 4th August, 2026, and shall make an endeavour to dispose of the Matrimonial Suit No. 46 of 2017 as expeditiously as possible but preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.) 2