APHC010748062016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1445/2016 Between: 1. PENUMALA KUTUMBA RAO,, S/O. LOKA RAJU, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. UD-LD, 276, OLD B. COLONY. KONDAPALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VIJAYANANAD, MANAGING DIRECTOR THE ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION, VIDYUT SOUDA, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI ASHOK KUMAR, CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HR), ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION, VIDYUT SOUDA, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI R PRABHAKARA RAO, CHIEF ENGINEER, DR. NARLA TATA RAO POWER STATION, TBRAIRNPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Section 10 and 12 of contempt. of Courts Act for willfully violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed by his Lordship Sri. Justice A.V. Sesha Sai, made in W.P.No. 18539 of 2016 in W.P. No. 14923/2016, dated 27-04-2016 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(APPL 722 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned Nlemo No. CEE/Q&M/Dr 2 NTTPS/Adm/C.5/D.No.1260116, dated 31-05-2016, issued by the 3rd respondent to issue appropriate orders implementing the orders of this Hon'ble Court made in W.P.M.P. No. 18539 of 2016 in W.P. No. 14923/2016, dated 27-04-2016 forthwith pending disposal of the above Contempt Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M. VIDYASAGAR, ( STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO ) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1445/2016 ORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events in the lis, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt case. However, the petitioner is permitted to work out all his remedies. 2. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out all his legal remedies. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 23.02.2026 SCH 4 300 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Contempt Case No.1445 of 2016 Date: 23.02.2026 SCH