Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2826 (GAU)

NUR ISLAM MIAH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS

I.A.(Civil)/938/2026 · 2026-03-22

Manish Choudhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No. 1/3 GAHC010245612025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/938/2026 NUR ISLAM MIAH SON OF TASHIRUDDIN MIAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KUNTICHAR PARTII P O. FALIMARI P.S. DIST DHUBRI ASSAM. 2: SAMINUR ISLAM SAKAR S/O- HAKIMUDDIN SARKAR R/O- VILLAGE-II NO. RIVER BLOCK MAJERCHAR P.O- MAJERCHAR P.S AND DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM 3: ISLAM ALI MONDAL S/O- PASHAN ALI MONDAL R/O- VILLAGE-II NO. RIVER BLOCK MAJERCHAR P.O- MAJERCHAR P.S AND DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM 4: MOYDAN ALI R/O- VILL KUNTICHAR PART II P.O- FALIMARI P.S AND DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER Page No. 2/3 PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT ASSAM 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DHUBRI ASSAM 3:THE ZILLA PARISHAD DHUBRI ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER DHARMASALA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O AND DIST-DHUBRI ASSAM 5:THE FALIMARI GAON PANCHAYAT FALIMARI P.O AND DIST-DHUBRI ASSAM 6:THE SECRETARY FALIMARI GAON PANCHAYAT P.O AND DIST-DHUBRI ASSAM 7:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DHUBRI P.O AND DIST-DHUBRI ASSAM 8:THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DHUBRI P.O AND DIST-DHUBRI ASSAM Advocate for : MRS. S ROY Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 23.03.2026 Heard Ms. S. Roy, learned counsel for the applicants-appellants; Mr. S. Dutta, learned Page No. 3/3 Standing Counsel, P&RD Department for the opposite party nos. 1, 3, 4 & 6; Ms. U. Das, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party nos. 2 & 7; and Ms. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 5. 2. The instant interlocutory application is preferred seeking impleadment of the two proposed party-respondents. 3. In view of the non-furnishing of proper addresses, Ms. Roy has sought for withdrawal of the application with liberty to file afresh. 4. The prayer is allowed. The instant application is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty to file afresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant