Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2825 (AP)

T RAJA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/15294/2026 · 2026-06-10

A Hari Haranadha Sarma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010290522026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15294/2026 Between: 1. T RAJA REDDY, S/O T.LAKSHMI REDDY, AGE 62 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3/16I-I8- 6-1-A, SBI COLONY, NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 2. T.BHARATHAMMA ,, W/O T.RAJA REDDY, AGE 52 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.3/161-18-6-1-A, SBI COLONY, NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONERS(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522239 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT-517325 3. THE SHO I TOWN POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT-517325 4. P BHASKAR REDDY, S/O P.VENKAT REDDY, GOVEMMENTTEACHER,R/O M.P.U.P SCHOOL, KOTAPALLE, MADANAPALLE (M), ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.-517325 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, Order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,by directing the Respondent No.3 not to interfere in the peaceful living of the petitioners, and not to interfere in civil disputes at the instigation of Respondent No.4 against the petitioners, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to call the petitioners to the police station, by involving for settlement of civil dispute between the petitioners and the Respondent.No.4,pending disposal of this writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioners(S): 1. BOTTA ARUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15294/2026 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.3 not to interfere with the peaceful living of the petitioners and not to interfere in civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.4 covered by O.S.No.734 of 2021 on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalle. 2. The brief case of the writ petitioners is that when the respondent No.4 failed to clear his dues, the petitioners filed a suit bearing O.S.No.734 of 2021 on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalle and the same was decreed and for execution of the same, E.P.No.14 of 2022 was filed. However, in the meanwhile, the defendant filed an application to set aside the same and the same was considered by the concerned Court. At that stage, wife of the defendant in the said suit approached the police and the police are trying to interfere with the civil dispute relating to the aforementioned civil suit, which is pending before the competent civil Court. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that one P.Lakshminarasamma, W/o P.Bhaskar Reddy, submitted a representation through the PGRS. On the basis of which, both parties were enquired and when the dispute was found civil in nature, 4 both parties are directed to resolve the dispute before the civil Court. The allegations made by the petitioners are contrary to the facts and the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.4. 5. In view of the written instructions placed on record and the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties, and recording the same, this Court finds that no further orders are required in the matter. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Date: 11.06.2026 KA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15294/2026 Date: 11.06.2026 KA