- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34743 WP No. 24693 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 24693 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI KALAIAH S/O, LATE BASAVALINGAIAH AND LATE KEMPAMMA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT DODDERI VILLAGE, THAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 130 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT JAYAMMA D/O LATE KEMPAMMA AND LATE BASAVALINGAIAH WIFE OF SADASHIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 2. SRI. CHANNAPPA S/O LATE KEMPAMMA AND LATE BASAVALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RESIDING AT WARD NO.31, ARCHAKARAHALLI, RAMANAGARA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34743 WP No. 24693 of 2025 3. SMT. GOWRAMMA, D/O LATE KEMPAMMA AND LATE BASAVALINGAIAH WIFE OF SADAPPA @ SADASHIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT DODDERI GRAMA, THAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 130 4. SMT. PARAVATHAMMA D/O LATE KEMPAMMA AND LATE BASAVALINGAIAH WIFE OF SADASHIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS PETITIONERS NO.1, 3 AND 4 ARE RESIDING AT DODDERI GRAMA, THAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 130 5. SRI. HONNAIAH, S/O LATE BETTAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.34, 1ST CROSS, BEHIND GANESH TEMPLE, CHOLURPALY, BENGALURU - 560 023 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE COMPROMISE DECREE DATED 06.03.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.485/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI, AS PER ANNEXURE- A AS BEING NULL AND VOID AB-INITIO. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34743 WP No. 24693 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed questioning the compromise decree dated 06.03.2018 passed in O.S.No.485/2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Magadi. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has advanced arguments on the merits of the matter. However, if the petitioner, being a party to the compromise decree and if he wants to question the same, the remedy does not lie before this Court, but before the very same Court. 3. Hence, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy before the competent Court in accordance with law. 4. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34743 WP No. 24693 of 2025 ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the competent Court in accordance with law. ii. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6