APHC010577172013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14421/2013 Between: C.narasimha Reddy & 8 Others and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Ap Another and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. K R PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ALONG WITH CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13615/2013 Between: Shri Annavaram Venkatarama Hanumakumr & 28 Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of A P Another ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. D MADHAVI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ALONG WITH CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14898/2013 Between: K.ravindra Babu, Guntur And Anr., and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND State Of Ap Thrsho Cid Ps Hyd Anr and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. K R PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NOs: 14421, 13615 and 14898 of 2013 COMMON ORDER : Crl.P. No.14421 of 2013 1. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.18 of 2013 of CID Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Crl.P. No.13615 of 2013 2. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.21 of 2013 of CID Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Crl.P. No.14898 of 2013 3. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.7 of 2013 of CID Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Criminal Petition No.11645 of 2013 and batch, proceedings were quashed against the petitioners therein on the ground that the petitioners filed OA and in the said OA, the Tribunal found that the certificates which were filed by the petitioners were genuine on the basis of the information provided by the Department. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners in the present Criminal Petitions are also part of the Judgment in OA.No.6299 of 2009 and batch passed by the Tribunal. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor also conceded that the subject matter of these Criminal Petitions are squarely covered by the orders passed in Criminal Petition No. No.11645 of 2013 and batch. 6. Since the petitioners also preferred OAs, are part of the order in OA.No.6299 of 2009, the proceedings in Crime No.18 of 2013 against petitioners in Criminal Petition No.14421 of 2013, proceedings in Crime No.21 of 2013 against the petitioners in Criminal Petition No.13615 of 2013 and proceedings in Crime No.7 of 2013 against petitioners in Criminal Petition No.14898 of 2013 are quashed. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition Nos.14421, 13615 and 14898 of 2013 are allowed. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ K SURESH REDDY, J Date: 13.03.2026 Asr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY Criminal Petition NOs.14421, 13615 and 14898 of 2013 Date: 13.03.2026 ASR