Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28225 (CAL)

BARKAT ALI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2791/2025 · 2026-07-13

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.07.2026 Serial no. 15 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 854 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Manikchak PS Case No. 690 of 2024 dated 15.09.2024 u/s 103(1)/61(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 25/27/35 of the Arms Act and Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substances (E.S.) Act, GR Case No. 6848 of 2024. -And- In the matter of : Monirul Islam … Petitioner(s) Mr. Sekhar Kr. Basu, Sr Adv. Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Kallol Mondal, ld. APP Mr. L. Vishal Kumar … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Mriyunjay Chatterjee … for the defacto-complainnt Mr. Basu, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly placed as the other accused person who has been granted bail in CRM (M) 707 of 2025. Learned Senior Advocate, as such, prays that the present petitioner may be released on bail. Mr. Mondal, learned PP, appears for the State and submits that there are criminal antecedents of the present petitioner. However, the order passed on 15.07.2025 reflects that there were criminal antecedents which were taken into consideration by the Co-ordinate Bench and bail was granted 2 to the other accused person, namely, Humaun Sk. Humayun in CRM (M) 707 of 2025. Accordingly, I direct that the petitioner [Monirul Islam] be released on bail on the same terms and conditions as was imposed on the other accused person, namely, Humaun Sk. Humayun in CRM (M) 707 of 2025. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner [Monirul Islam] is Allowed. Accordingly, CRM (M) 854 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)