Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28204 (AP)

J.Paul Sunil v. Mr.AdarshSinha, IAS

CC/1290/2014 · 2026-03-16

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010733632014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1290/2014 Between: 1. J.PAUL SUNIL,, S/O J.ISAAC, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, LECTURER IN POLITICAL SCIENCE(UNAIDED), A.C.COLLEGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MR ADARSHSINHA IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, AGED : NOT KNOWN, OCC: PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. SMT K SUNITHA IAS, D/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED NOT KNOWN, COMMISIONER& DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the respondents for willfully, intentionally and deliberately disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in WPMP.No.26787/2012 in WP.No.20912/2012 dated 4.10.2013 under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act and also under the powers vested under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(APPL 904 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to delete the name of the 1st respondent in C.C.No.1290/14, in WPMP No.26787/12, in WP No.20912/12, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition Nos.2444 of 2013 and batch were disposed off by this Court by an order dated 17.10.2024. In view of the said order and the disposal of the writ petitions, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.03.2026 NKA 282 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO:1290 of 2014 Date: 17.03.2026 NKA