JITENDRA @ JEETU S/O SHRI CHANDRALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2701/2026 · 2026-03-10
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 282 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 282 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10254] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2701/2026 Jitendra @ Jeetu S/o Shri Chandralal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Pali, Police Station Mahuva, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 10/03/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 388/2025 registered at Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur (South) for the offence(s) under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 112(2), 3(5) BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; recovery has already been effected; He further submits that co-accused Shivadayal has been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 18.02.2026 in S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2389/2026; petitioner is behind the bars since 30.01.2026; conclusion of trial may take a long time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and,
[2026:RJ-JP:10254] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2701/2026] therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since 30.01.2026; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Jitendra @ Jeetu S/o Shri Chandralal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
[2026:RJ-JP:10254] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2701/2026]
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/74