CWP-20459 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Kuldeep Kaur State of Punjab and CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Article 226 Mandamus upon allotment against a vacant station, in view of letters dated 18.02.2026 (Annexure P 2. submits that, at this stage, the petitioner direction is passed upon 21.04.2026 (Annexure P 3. 4. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the At the outset, he fairly submits that he has no objection, in case, a Mandamus is passed upon respondent the legal notice 5. prayer has been made is disposed of, consider and decide the within a period of 459-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kuldeep Kaur Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) The petitioner, by way of instant writ petition, as cast under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, Mandamus upon the respondents to consider and decide her claim for re allotment against a vacant station, in view of letters dated 18.02.2026 (Annexure P-7) and 06.05.2026 (Annexure P At the outset, learned counsel for submits that, at this stage, the petitioner direction is passed upon respondent No.2, 21.04.2026 (Annexure P-3). Notice of motion. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents At the outset, he fairly submits that he has no objection, in case, a Mandamus is passed upon respondent No.2 legal notice (supra). In view of the above, and since a prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner, the instant writ petition disposed of, by issuing a Mandamus upon consider and decide the legal notice (supra), within a period of six weeks from the receipt of a certified copy of this IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20459-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.07.2026 ….Petitioner ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate, The petitioner, by way of instant writ petition, as cast under of the Constitution of India, prays for issuance of a consider and decide her claim for re- allotment against a vacant station, in view of letters dated 18.02.2026 7) and 06.05.2026 (Annexure P-8). At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that, at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case, a respondent No.2, to decide the legal notice dated Sahil R. Bakshi, learned Assistant Advocate General, respondents and waives service. At the outset, he fairly submits that he has no objection, in case, a No.2, to take a final decision upon ince a bona fide and innocuous the petitioner, the instant writ petition by issuing a Mandamus upon respondent No.2, to (supra), by passing a speaking order, from the receipt of a certified copy of this .2026 s The petitioner, by way of instant writ petition, as cast under of a - allotment against a vacant station, in view of letters dated 18.02.2026 fairly would be satisfied in case, a the legal notice dated Sahil R. Bakshi, learned Assistant Advocate General, and waives service. At the outset, he fairly submits that he has no objection, in case, a final decision upon innocuous the petitioner, the instant writ petition to by passing a speaking order, from the receipt of a certified copy of this AMIT KUMAR 2026.07.10 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-20459 order. Needless to assert that before drawing a final order, a due opportunity of hearing shall be afforde 6. hereinabove direction application/motion for revival of the instant petition. 09.07.2026 Ak Sharma 459-2026 (O&M) -2- order. Needless to assert that before drawing a final order, a due opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the petitioner. However, in the event of default in compliance of the hereinabove direction, the petitioner is application/motion for revival of the instant petition. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable order. Needless to assert that before drawing a final order, a due d to the petitioner. in the event of default in compliance of the is at liberty to move an apt application/motion for revival of the instant petition. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No order. Needless to assert that before drawing a final order, a due in the event of default in compliance of the at liberty to move an apt AMIT KUMAR 2026.07.10 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document