Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2026 DAILYLAW 2819 (BOM)
MR. ASHISH @ TEJVANT VIJAYRAO BHANDAKKAR v. SAU. VAISHALI @ RINA ASHISH @ TEJVANT BHANDAKKAR
WP/158/2026 · 2026-07-27
Shri M M Nerlikar
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2819 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2819 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (1) wp 158.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.158/2026 (Ashish @ Tajvant V Sau. Vaishali @ Rina) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.N. Shinde, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : M.M. Nerlikar, J.
DATE : 27-07-2026. On instructions, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition.
2. Permission is granted.
3. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
4. However, the trial Court is requested to conclude the trial expeditiously.
5. The sum of Rs. 20,000/- deposited by the petitioner shall be remitted to the trial Court.
6. It is needless to mention that, if the respondent-wife files an application for withdrawal of the aforesaid amount, the same shall be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law. Judge Deshmukh