HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18541 of 2026 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Anirudh Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to allow this application and quash the Charge-sheet dated 16.09.2025, being C.S. No. 375/2025 as well as entire proceedings registered in its pursuance as Criminal Case No.406 of 2026, (State of U.P. Vs. Sumit and Others), under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS & Section 3/4 DP Act, 1961 against Applicant No.1 to 6 and under Sections 75, 85, 115(2), 352,351(3) BNS & Section 3/4 DP Act, 1961 against Applicant No.7 arising out of Case Crime No.412 of 2025, registered at Police Station-Nai Mandi, District-Muzaffarnagar, including order of cognizance as well as summoning order dated 12.01.2026 passed by Court below in aforesaid proceedings, presently pending before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Muzaffarnagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submit that the parties have amicably settled their disputes vide compromise dated 17.03.2026, which has been placed as "Annexure No.-6" to the application. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings before the Court concerned and the same is not only sheer wastage of time of the Court but also abuse of process of law. 4. Learned A.G.A., however, submits that it is the Trial Court, which has to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anirudh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sumit Saini @ Sumit And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) verify the fact as to whether the parties have entered into compromise, hence the applicants may approach the concerned Court and move an application with respect to compromise between the parties, which will be decided in accordance with law. 5. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicants and opposite party No. 2 are directed to appear before the Trial Court along with compromise deed as well certified copy of this order within three weeks from today. It is expected that Court concerned may fix a date for the verification of the compromise and after ensuring the presence of the parties, pass an appropriate order with respect to the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. While passing the order verifying the compromise, the Court concerned shall also record the statements of the parties as to whether all the terms and conditions mentioned in the original compromise deed, so filed, have been fulfilled or not. 6. The Court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. Till verification of compromise between the parties by the Court concerned, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 8. With the aforesaid directions, this application is disposed of. May 5, 2026 Aditya Tripathi NA528 No. 18541 of 2026 2 (Nand Prabha Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ADITYA TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad