Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28188 (JHR)

BIPIN YADAV @ BIPIN KUMAR @ BIPIN KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5626/2026 · 2026-10-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:30230 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5626 of 2026 ------ 1. Bipin Yadav @ Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Kumar Yadav, Aged about 29 years, 2. Rishu Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Yadav, Aged about 23 years, Both are S/o –Yamuna Yadav @ Jamuna Yadav, R/o – Purani Sahibganj, P.O. –Sahibganj, P.S. –Sahibganj (T), District –Sahibganj. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Pratyush Lala, Advocate : Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08.10.2026 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Sahibganj Nagar P.S. Case No.123 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319 (2), 336(2), 338, 340 (2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and 47 (a) Excise Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were involved in sale of wine at high price in Bihar. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 19 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. It is also submitted that the co-accused person has already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 24.09.2026 in A.B.A. No. 5349 of 2026. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering aforesaid facts of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the above-named petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj Nagar P.S. Case No.123 of 2026 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08.10.2026 Sonu/