Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28177 (AP)

K SIVAMMA v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/103/2026 · 2026-01-05

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010723832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 103/2026 Between: 1. K SIVAMMA, W/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O. CHAGALERU VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 2. 2. NARAYANAMMA,, W/O. VENKATESU, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. CHAGALERU VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT(ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT). 3. 3. JOINTCOLLECTOR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT(ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT). 4. 4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PENUKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT(ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT). 5. 5. TAHSILDAR, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT(ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT). 2 6. THE SUBREGISTRAR, CHILAMATHUR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT). 7. 7. DISTRICT REGISTRAR, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 6TH respondent in refusing to furnish the Market value certificate for registration of the document with regard to the property to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents each covered by Survey No.396/1 situated in Chagaleru Village, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District(Erstwhile Anantapur District) as illegal, irregular, irrational, violative of the provisions of Registration Act, 1908 and Offends Articles 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 6TH respondent to furnish the market value certificate and entertain the document to be presented by the petitioners for registration and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the 6TH respondent to furnish the Market value certificate and entertain the document to be presented by the petitioners in respect of the property to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents each covered by Survey No.396/1 situated in Chagaleru Village, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District(Erstwhile Anantapur District) forthwith, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAVULURU KRISHNA SAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 6th respondent in refusing to furnish the Market Value Certificate for registration of the document in respect of the property admeasuring Ac.1.50 cents each, covered by Survey No.396/1, situated at Chagaleru Village, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District (erstwhile Anantapur District), as illegal, irregular, irrational, violative of the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, and offending Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the 6th respondent to furnish the Market Value Certificate and entertain the document to be presented by the petitioners for registration and pass such further orders…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, in similar circumstances, this Court disposed of a writ petition vide W.P. No.33347 of 2025, dated 11.12.2025, and requested that a similar order be passed in the present writ petition. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing on behalf of the respondents, did not dispute the submission that the said order covers the issue involved in the present writ petition. He further submitted that the survey number involved in both matters is one and the same, namely Survey No.396/1 situated at Chagaleru Village, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Satya 4 Sai District (erstwhile Anantapur District), that the said survey number has been deleted from the prohibitory list, and that the Market Value Certificate has also been issued upon application. 4. Considering the submissions made by both learned counsel, this Court finds that nothing survives for further adjudication in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 6th January, 2026 cbn 5 391 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH Writ Petition No.103 of 2026 6th January, 2026 cbn