CRM-M-31869-2026 -1- 288 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31869-2026 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 Naveen Kamra alias Naveen …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and another …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Hitesh Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. Dharamvir Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Tarun Kaushik, Advocate with Mr. Aryavart Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.156, dated 12.06.2025, registered under Sections 115, 126 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 (Sections 323, 341 and 506 of IPC), at Police Station Sector 56, Gurugram, District Gurugram (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. Vide order dated 29.05.2026, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-2). HEMLATA 2026.07.09 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31869-2026 -2- 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. Report dated 15.06.2026 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioner. 6. Resultantly, FIR No.156, dated 12.06.2025, registered under Sections 115, 126 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 (Sections 323, 341 and 506 of IPC), at Police Station Sector 56, Gurugram, District Gurugram (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-2) are hereby quashed qua the petitioner. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 08.07.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2026.07.09 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document