Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28174 (AP)

Kanaka Dileep Kumar v. THE STATE OF AP

CRLP/21/2026 · 2026-01-19

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010720532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 21/2026 Between: 1. KANAKA DILEEP KUMAR, S/O.RAMESH BABU, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 19-6-5, KAMSALI PETA, CHITTI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT AMARAVATHI, NELAPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KANAKA NISSY SINDHUJA, KANAKA NISSY SINDHUJA, W/O.DILIP KUMAR, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.7-131, BJR NAGAR, NEAR COMMUNITY HALL, KESARAPALLI VILLAGE, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 21/2026 O R D E R: 1. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The Petitioner has filed this Petition seeking for quashment of the charges in C.C.No.48 of 2024 on the file of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gannavaram. 3. The Police after thorough investigation, filed charge sheet against the Petitioner and four (04) other accused persons, who are the relatives of the Petitioner. The Investigation Officer examined as many as seven (07) witnesses. They spoke about alleged harassment of the Petitioner. There are no merits in this petition for quashment of the Charge Sheet inasmuch as on perusal of the averments of the Charge Sheet, the accusations are well founded. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Criminal Petition is disposed of directing the learned Trial Court not to insist the presence of the Petitioner on each and every adjournment. However, the learned Trial Court is at liberty to secure presence of the Petitioner as and when required. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. ______________________________ DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO Dated 20.01.2026. KS. 3 168 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 21/2026 Dated 20.01.2026. KS