VAISHNAVI FERRO TECH PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR NAMELY SUNIL BANSAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cont.(Cvl)/67/2026 · 2026-04-06
Sanjay Prasad, Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2817 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2817 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:9678-DB 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No.67 of 2026
----- Vaishnavi Ferro Tech (Pvt.) Ltd., having its registered office at Rauta, P.O. Marar, P.S. Mandu District Ramgarh, PIN 829117, through its Director namely, Sunil Bansal, aged about 58 years, son of Shri Tirlok Chand Bansal, resident of 5A, 5th Floor, Trinity Residency, Ranchi Road, Sewta, P.O. Marar, P.S. Mandu, District Ramgarh, PIN 829117 (Jharkhand)
… … … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand,
2. Shri Arwa Rajkamal, son of – not known to Petitioner, posted as Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Yojna Bhawan (Nepal House), Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, PIN 834002 (Jharkhand).
3. Smt. Akansha Ranjan, daughter/wife of – not known to Petitioner, posted as Director of Industries, Department of Industries, having its office at Yojna Bhawan (Nepal House), Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, PIN 834002 (Jharkhand).
4. Shambhu Sharan Baitha, son of not known to Petitioner, posted as General Manager, District Industries Centre, Department of Industries, Government of Jharkhand, Hazaribagh, P.O. and P.S.- Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)
… … … Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prakhar Harit, Advocate
: Mr. Amish Lal, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shray Mishra, AC to AG
----------
Order No.04/Dated 06th April 2026
1. The instant contempt case has been filed against the opposite parties for alleged deliberate and willful non-compliance of the order dated 11.04.2019 passed in LPA No. 207 of 2015 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the concerned opposite parties has submitted that the order passed by this Court has already been complied with its letter and spirit.
2026:JHHC:9678-DB 2
3. The aforesaid fact has not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, this instant contempt case is closed and stands
disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Date : 06.04.2026 Kamlesh/ Nishant/-