Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2817 (CHH)

INDRAMAN KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/54/2026 · 2026-01-06

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:938 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 54 of 2026 1 - Indraman Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shobharam Sahu Aged About 57 Years Posted As Head Master, Govt. Middle School Patewa Block Abhanpur, Tahsil Nawapara Dist. Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Divisional Joint Director Public Instructions, Education Division, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 6 - The Block Education Officer Block Education And Training Center, Abhanpur, District- Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 07/01/2026 1. On objection being raised by learned counsel for State that petitioner is having alternate efficacious remedy of appeal under Rule 23 of C.G. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal), Rules 1966, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he may be permitted to BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the alternate efficacious remedy as provided under the Rules of 1966. 2. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, in the event, petitioner files an appeal, the appellate authority shall consider and decide the appeal expeditiously preferably within further period of 45 days from the date of filing of appeal. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram