Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28169 (CAL)

XXXXX v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/1196/2026 · 2026-07-14

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.483. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 1196 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Hanskhali Police Station case no. 751 of 2023 dated 24.09.2023 under Sections 363/376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. And In the matter of : XXXXX ……Petitioner. Mr. Brajesh Jha Mr. Arnab Sau ……for the State. State has produced the Case Diary and submitted that out of 12 witnesses cited by the prosecution 5 witnesses have already been examined. Attention of the Court has been drawn to the statement of the victim before the learned Magistrate. I have taken into account the nature of the accusations of sexual assault committed at the behest of the petitioner. Having considered the same as well as the stage of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1196 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)