APHC010722862013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22455/2013 Between: 1.C.NAGABHUSHANAM,, S/O. CHINNA SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, KOTHA GANGIREDDIPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, PENDLIMARRI MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR / DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, KADAPA, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR/JOINT SECRETARY, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, KADAPA, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 3.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PENDLIMARRI MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRit of Mandamus declaring the order of the 1st respondent in his Progs.Rc.No.C9/2449/Pendlimarri/3SA/2010, dated 03.11.2011 rejecting the appeal of the petitioner against the removal order without application of mind, without consideration of the records and even without noticing the irregularities done by the 2nd and 3rd respondents in the disciplinary proceedings as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, callous, mechanical, whimsical and fanciful and against concept of the disciplinary proceedings and against Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his Progs.Rc.No.C9/2449/Pendlimarri/3SA/2010, dt. 03.11.2011 confirming the petitioner's removal and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Field Assistant, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, Kotha Gangireddipalli Gram Panchayat, Pendlimarri Mandal, Y.S.R. District with back wages and attendant benefits with continuity of service IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 27544 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his 2 Progs.Rc.No.C9/2449/Pendlimarri/3SA/2010, dated 03.11.2011 by continuing the petitioner as Field Assistant, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.22455 OF 2013 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 4 14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.22455 OF 2013 Dated02.03.2026 KGM