- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34762-DB WA No. 1160 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 1160 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. VINAYA A SAPALYA, W/O ASHOKA SAPALYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.2-138/2, DEVINAGARA, TALAPADY, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 022. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPT. BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, MYSURU SUB-DIVISION, MYSURU - 570 001. Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34762-DB WA No. 1160 of 2026 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, D.K. DISTRICT, MANGALURU - 575 001. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 001. 5. THE TASILDAR, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 001. 6. SMT. SUGANDHI, W/O NARAYANA MOILY, MAJOR, R/AT DEVINAGARA, TALAPADY, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 022. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 TO R5, SRI. RAKESH KINI, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:11.02.2026 PASSED IN WP NO.24873/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE, AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AS PRAYED FOR. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34762-DB WA No. 1160 of 2026 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present intra Court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 11.02.2026 passed by the Writ Court in WP.No.24873/2023 filed by the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has suffered an adverse decree in OS.No.512/2017 filed by him as well as OS.No.1199/2019 filed by the respondents in respect of the same land. The petitioner despite having suffered the decree filed the writ petition praying that plotting done on the land in question should be declared as null and void. We fail to understand that once the petitioner has suffered the decree, how the prayer made in the writ petition would be sustainable. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34762-DB WA No. 1160 of 2026 3. We therefore, find no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, However, the petitioner will have the liberty to seek remedy, if he is so advised in the pending appeals against the judgment and decree passed in the aforementioned OS. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending I.A., if any, does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19 ct-vn